<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MTB + Web 2.0 = Geoladder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/</link>
	<description>web 2.0, design &#38; community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hester</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-4388</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-4388</guid>
		<description>Ok, Joe... you win. I&#039;ll go register at rydezilla and check it out. 

I still think the page guests get when they click on a ride could do a better job of explaining why you don&#039;t get what you expect. Something like what Trails.com does (a tiny synopsis of the trail and a big-ass message that says sign-up for all the juicy details).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Joe&#8230; you win. I&#8217;ll go register at rydezilla and check it out. </p>
<p>I still think the page guests get when they click on a ride could do a better job of explaining why you don&#8217;t get what you expect. Something like what Trails.com does (a tiny synopsis of the trail and a big-ass message that says sign-up for all the juicy details).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hester</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-100021</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-100021</guid>
		<description>Ok, Joe... you win. I&#039;ll go register at rydezilla and check it out. 

I still think the page guests get when they click on a ride could do a better job of explaining why you don&#039;t get what you expect. Something like what Trails.com does (a tiny synopsis of the trail and a big-ass message that says sign-up for all the juicy details).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Joe&#8230; you win. I&#8217;ll go register at rydezilla and check it out. </p>
<p>I still think the page guests get when they click on a ride could do a better job of explaining why you don&#8217;t get what you expect. Something like what Trails.com does (a tiny synopsis of the trail and a big-ass message that says sign-up for all the juicy details).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-4385</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-4385</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re right, to compare the two sites in regards to web 2.0 features, one needs to be logged in. in regards to trails, i love the walk-thru   photos of each trail on geoladders; on rydezilla, i love the 3D rotating/zooming capability for each trail plus the ability to draw routes that are not listed. in regards to scheduling rides, the ride detail page for rydezilla makes you want to say BEDONKADONK! joining and sending messages, viewing photos/videos/blogs is all AJAX enabled. the two sites are great, and both are USEFUL i.e. Web 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right, to compare the two sites in regards to web 2.0 features, one needs to be logged in. in regards to trails, i love the walk-thru   photos of each trail on geoladders; on rydezilla, i love the 3D rotating/zooming capability for each trail plus the ability to draw routes that are not listed. in regards to scheduling rides, the ride detail page for rydezilla makes you want to say BEDONKADONK! joining and sending messages, viewing photos/videos/blogs is all AJAX enabled. the two sites are great, and both are USEFUL i.e. Web 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-100020</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-100020</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re right, to compare the two sites in regards to web 2.0 features, one needs to be logged in. in regards to trails, i love the walk-thru   photos of each trail on geoladders; on rydezilla, i love the 3D rotating/zooming capability for each trail plus the ability to draw routes that are not listed. in regards to scheduling rides, the ride detail page for rydezilla makes you want to say BEDONKADONK! joining and sending messages, viewing photos/videos/blogs is all AJAX enabled. the two sites are great, and both are USEFUL i.e. Web 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right, to compare the two sites in regards to web 2.0 features, one needs to be logged in. in regards to trails, i love the walk-thru   photos of each trail on geoladders; on rydezilla, i love the 3D rotating/zooming capability for each trail plus the ability to draw routes that are not listed. in regards to scheduling rides, the ride detail page for rydezilla makes you want to say BEDONKADONK! joining and sending messages, viewing photos/videos/blogs is all AJAX enabled. the two sites are great, and both are USEFUL i.e. Web 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hester</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip, Joe. Rydezilla looks similar in to Geoladders in some respects. Just a couple notes though. It&#039;s much more graphic-heavy, with a MTB/grunge look that makes page load times a bit slower (my unscientific, shoot-from-the-hip analysis). Also, I clicked on some of the trails but it kept taking me to an &quot;about&quot; page. I&#039;m thinking I don&#039;t get to see the trail detail without registering maybe? Grrrr.... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, Joe. Rydezilla looks similar in to Geoladders in some respects. Just a couple notes though. It&#8217;s much more graphic-heavy, with a MTB/grunge look that makes page load times a bit slower (my unscientific, shoot-from-the-hip analysis). Also, I clicked on some of the trails but it kept taking me to an &#8220;about&#8221; page. I&#8217;m thinking I don&#8217;t get to see the trail detail without registering maybe? Grrrr&#8230;. <img src='http://www.jeffhester.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hester</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-100019</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-100019</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip, Joe. Rydezilla looks similar in to Geoladders in some respects. Just a couple notes though. It&#039;s much more graphic-heavy, with a MTB/grunge look that makes page load times a bit slower (my unscientific, shoot-from-the-hip analysis). Also, I clicked on some of the trails but it kept taking me to an &quot;about&quot; page. I&#039;m thinking I don&#039;t get to see the trail detail without registering maybe? Grrrr.... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, Joe. Rydezilla looks similar in to Geoladders in some respects. Just a couple notes though. It&#8217;s much more graphic-heavy, with a MTB/grunge look that makes page load times a bit slower (my unscientific, shoot-from-the-hip analysis). Also, I clicked on some of the trails but it kept taking me to an &#8220;about&#8221; page. I&#8217;m thinking I don&#8217;t get to see the trail detail without registering maybe? Grrrr&#8230;. <img src='http://www.jeffhester.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>geoladders is a really nice site. it&#039;s great resource for finding trails in the local area. i also like www.rydezilla.com. it&#039;s primary purpose is to schedule bike rides. it has web 2.0   mountain biking written all over it. it&#039;s 3D aspect of it is not static like geoladders, but rather interactive that you can zoom in and rotate. check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geoladders is a really nice site. it&#8217;s great resource for finding trails in the local area. i also like <a href="http://www.rydezilla.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rydezilla.com</a>. it&#8217;s primary purpose is to schedule bike rides. it has web 2.0   mountain biking written all over it. it&#8217;s 3D aspect of it is not static like geoladders, but rather interactive that you can zoom in and rotate. check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/comment-page-1/#comment-100018</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2006/12/27/mtb-web-20-geoladder/#comment-100018</guid>
		<description>geoladders is a really nice site. it&#039;s great resource for finding trails in the local area. i also like www.rydezilla.com. it&#039;s primary purpose is to schedule bike rides. it has web 2.0   mountain biking written all over it. it&#039;s 3D aspect of it is not static like geoladders, but rather interactive that you can zoom in and rotate. check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geoladders is a really nice site. it&#8217;s great resource for finding trails in the local area. i also like <a href="http://www.rydezilla.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rydezilla.com</a>. it&#8217;s primary purpose is to schedule bike rides. it has web 2.0   mountain biking written all over it. it&#8217;s 3D aspect of it is not static like geoladders, but rather interactive that you can zoom in and rotate. check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
