<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Bit Literacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/</link>
	<description>web 2.0, design &#38; community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Cornell</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-96314</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-96314</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the helpful review. I found the book full of immediately-applicable ideas, and I thought Mark&#039;s perspective was unique. Regarding the file-naming, I have a client who was having serious trouble managing documents and versions. Rather than a full-blown source control system (or using Word&#039;s revision feature) I showed him Mark&#039;s convention. He loved it! Simple, I think is one of the book&#039;s strengths. This is a plus for me - I read a ton of personal productivity books, and many are padded out to hundreds of pages - unnecessarily, IMHO.

P.S. I just interviewed him a few days ago, and he gave me additional ideas to think about, esp. from a GTD perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the helpful review. I found the book full of immediately-applicable ideas, and I thought Mark&#8217;s perspective was unique. Regarding the file-naming, I have a client who was having serious trouble managing documents and versions. Rather than a full-blown source control system (or using Word&#8217;s revision feature) I showed him Mark&#8217;s convention. He loved it! Simple, I think is one of the book&#8217;s strengths. This is a plus for me &#8211; I read a ton of personal productivity books, and many are padded out to hundreds of pages &#8211; unnecessarily, IMHO.</p>
<p>P.S. I just interviewed him a few days ago, and he gave me additional ideas to think about, esp. from a GTD perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin Mann's "Inbox Zero" talk at Google</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-69927</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin Mann's "Inbox Zero" talk at Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-69927</guid>
		<description>[...] presented a talk titled &#8220;Inbox Zero&#8221; at Google this past Monday. Inbox Zero echoes the bit literacy concepts promoted by Mark Hurst. The video is an hour long, but Merlin provides a compelling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presented a talk titled &#8220;Inbox Zero&#8221; at Google this past Monday. Inbox Zero echoes the bit literacy concepts promoted by Mark Hurst. The video is an hour long, but Merlin provides a compelling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tigerblade</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-62412</link>
		<dc:creator>Tigerblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-62412</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still reading through the book when I get some spare time every once in a while, so by now I&#039;ve just gotten through the chapter on managing photos.  (bear in mind it was Sunday I finished that chapter, and this is now Tuesday.)

For the to-do list, I have to agree with you Jeff that Outlook works just fine for me.  That&#039;s not a knock on gootodo, but in a corporate environment like this, Outlook is the best tool for the job.  Not that it&#039;s the best tool for every job, but in an Exchange environment where everyone needs to be on the same system to be productive, Outlook folders and such are sufficient.  Dare I say almost irreplaceable?  Without a complete corporate overhaul to shift to some new system, we have to make do.  Gootodo or a similar system might be a good supplement, but not a replacement for practical purposes.

And, for the first time, yesterday I zeroed my inbox.  This morning I came in, sat down, weeded through the deluge of new e-mails from last night, and once again my inbox is at zero.  It&#039;s... an odd feeling.  I can relate to the example in the book of someone who said, &quot;well now what do I do?&quot;  Of course, that&#039;s just my work inbox.

My personal inbox(es) are almost never at zero, but none of that is work-related or action-required material: just quick notes from friends or the like that don&#039;t really need to be moved anywhere at the moment.  They just serve as quick reminders.  I don&#039;t want to start a to-do list of personal things like calling my brother-in-law... it&#039;s unnecessary.

You know... I think once I finish the book I&#039;ll just write my own review instead of pouring out step-by-step reviews here.  Not to say I won&#039;t be back to this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still reading through the book when I get some spare time every once in a while, so by now I&#8217;ve just gotten through the chapter on managing photos.  (bear in mind it was Sunday I finished that chapter, and this is now Tuesday.)</p>
<p>For the to-do list, I have to agree with you Jeff that Outlook works just fine for me.  That&#8217;s not a knock on gootodo, but in a corporate environment like this, Outlook is the best tool for the job.  Not that it&#8217;s the best tool for every job, but in an Exchange environment where everyone needs to be on the same system to be productive, Outlook folders and such are sufficient.  Dare I say almost irreplaceable?  Without a complete corporate overhaul to shift to some new system, we have to make do.  Gootodo or a similar system might be a good supplement, but not a replacement for practical purposes.</p>
<p>And, for the first time, yesterday I zeroed my inbox.  This morning I came in, sat down, weeded through the deluge of new e-mails from last night, and once again my inbox is at zero.  It&#8217;s&#8230; an odd feeling.  I can relate to the example in the book of someone who said, &#8220;well now what do I do?&#8221;  Of course, that&#8217;s just my work inbox.</p>
<p>My personal inbox(es) are almost never at zero, but none of that is work-related or action-required material: just quick notes from friends or the like that don&#8217;t really need to be moved anywhere at the moment.  They just serve as quick reminders.  I don&#8217;t want to start a to-do list of personal things like calling my brother-in-law&#8230; it&#8217;s unnecessary.</p>
<p>You know&#8230; I think once I finish the book I&#8217;ll just write my own review instead of pouring out step-by-step reviews here.  Not to say I won&#8217;t be back to this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hurst</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-57759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-57759</guid>
		<description>Tigerblade - I&#039;d encourage you to try it. People are often skeptical until they start really practicing the method. I think you&#039;ll be surprised at the benefits the empty inbox brings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tigerblade &#8211; I&#8217;d encourage you to try it. People are often skeptical until they start really practicing the method. I think you&#8217;ll be surprised at the benefits the empty inbox brings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hester</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-57433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-57433</guid>
		<description>Tigerblade, I agree that you need to do what works for you. I think for newbies who don&#039;t have an established, viable strategy for managing email, Bit Literacy offers a good practice. 

Theoretically, it makes sense to deal with email daily; moving tasks to a task list; moving events and appointments to a calendar.

Of course, I am a worst case example. I have my work account, my BigBlueBall account, and a Gmail account that I all check daily -- and all of them still hold months (or even years) of old emails. I also have accounts on Hotmail and Yahoo, but I rarely even check those. 

What I really should do is have three accounts. One for work, one for my website businesses, and one for personal email. Get rid of the others and do a thorough purge of what remains. I&#039;m going to give it a try this week and report back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tigerblade, I agree that you need to do what works for you. I think for newbies who don&#8217;t have an established, viable strategy for managing email, Bit Literacy offers a good practice. </p>
<p>Theoretically, it makes sense to deal with email daily; moving tasks to a task list; moving events and appointments to a calendar.</p>
<p>Of course, I am a worst case example. I have my work account, my BigBlueBall account, and a Gmail account that I all check daily &#8212; and all of them still hold months (or even years) of old emails. I also have accounts on Hotmail and Yahoo, but I rarely even check those. </p>
<p>What I really should do is have three accounts. One for work, one for my website businesses, and one for personal email. Get rid of the others and do a thorough purge of what remains. I&#8217;m going to give it a try this week and report back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tigerblade</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-57257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tigerblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-57257</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;ve only just begun BL, but here are my comments thus far:

It&#039;s not all that practical to completely empty your inbox every day.  I certainly don&#039;t face quite the overload that he mentions in his opening chapters (i.e. &quot;Busy Man&quot;), but completely wiping out my inbox doesn&#039;t work for me.

I try to keep my inbox floating around ten e-mails on any given day.  Yes, most of my incoming mail can be immediately sorted into one of several dozen project folders and subfolders.  Meeting requests are saved to a calendar and discarded, and the same goes for tasks.  I routinely check through my folders to see if I can delete e-mail strings that have since been updated (instead of the one from two days ago with messages D-C-B-A, I keep the one from yesterday with messages G-F-E-D-C-B-A).

But... some of my e-mails don&#039;t merit a folder of their own, yet can&#039;t be deleted yet.  For example, one of the e-mails currently in my inbox *technically* could be moved to a project folder, but it&#039;s an extremely short reminder to check the status of a project once it launches.  If I move it to the associated project folder, it&#039;ll quickly get lost among the other, more important e-mails, and I&#039;ll be back to overload.  Things like that.

I have no problem keeping some e-mails in my inbox without getting overloaded.  I think Hurst is trying to be a little too gung-ho on a problem that doesn&#039;t merit such an extreme solution.  No?

I&#039;ll let you know how it goes once I get further into it.  I was at my sister&#039;s wedding this weekend, so I had precious little time to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ve only just begun BL, but here are my comments thus far:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not all that practical to completely empty your inbox every day.  I certainly don&#8217;t face quite the overload that he mentions in his opening chapters (i.e. &#8220;Busy Man&#8221;), but completely wiping out my inbox doesn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
<p>I try to keep my inbox floating around ten e-mails on any given day.  Yes, most of my incoming mail can be immediately sorted into one of several dozen project folders and subfolders.  Meeting requests are saved to a calendar and discarded, and the same goes for tasks.  I routinely check through my folders to see if I can delete e-mail strings that have since been updated (instead of the one from two days ago with messages D-C-B-A, I keep the one from yesterday with messages G-F-E-D-C-B-A).</p>
<p>But&#8230; some of my e-mails don&#8217;t merit a folder of their own, yet can&#8217;t be deleted yet.  For example, one of the e-mails currently in my inbox *technically* could be moved to a project folder, but it&#8217;s an extremely short reminder to check the status of a project once it launches.  If I move it to the associated project folder, it&#8217;ll quickly get lost among the other, more important e-mails, and I&#8217;ll be back to overload.  Things like that.</p>
<p>I have no problem keeping some e-mails in my inbox without getting overloaded.  I think Hurst is trying to be a little too gung-ho on a problem that doesn&#8217;t merit such an extreme solution.  No?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let you know how it goes once I get further into it.  I was at my sister&#8217;s wedding this weekend, so I had precious little time to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hester</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-55608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-55608</guid>
		<description>Tigerblade, &#039;Bit Literacy&#039; is the kind of book that you want to share. Let me know what you think after you get a chance to read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tigerblade, &#8216;Bit Literacy&#8217; is the kind of book that you want to share. Let me know what you think after you get a chance to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tigerblade</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-55604</link>
		<dc:creator>Tigerblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffhester.net/2007/05/28/review-bit-literacy/#comment-55604</guid>
		<description>Get this, the manager in charge of my department has read this book and decided it&#039;s worthwhile to buy a copy for everyone in the department (myself included).  So I get to read this book (and keep it) for free!

Wooooooooooo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get this, the manager in charge of my department has read this book and decided it&#8217;s worthwhile to buy a copy for everyone in the department (myself included).  So I get to read this book (and keep it) for free!</p>
<p>Wooooooooooo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
